A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, March 3, 2017

LOOKING AT THE CIVILITY QUESTION

As it has been stated in this blog:  this blog assumes that civics education has a responsibility to promote civility.  While this might be questioned in some quarters, the position here is that not only do schools, including public schools, have this responsibility, but that they are not meeting it.  This and the following postings will expand on this position.
By its nature, civility deals with values; i.e., normative questions.  This brings up several areas of interest:  how should the normative questions of citizenship and civility be handled in American classrooms?  Is the whole notion of imparting a view of civility a legitimate role for civics teachers to play?  If so, given any legitimate concern over indoctrination that Americans might have, what is the best method for presenting such lessons?
An interesting episode of political theater took place early in President Obama's presidency.  He offered a “beginning of the school year” message that was to be made available to schools around the country.  A clamor arose.  Was this an attempt by the government to impose a political message on school age children? 
Of course, such developments must be judged against the political climate of a given time.  But the underlying concern was an undue governmental influence on the political and civic beliefs of its citizens.  Despite the apparent theatrics of this interchange between the President and his detractors, this concern over government overreaching into domains of personal life or attempts at indoctrination are real and ongoing concerns.
The question of whether civility is a legitimate topic for civics education might be a touchy one for some. When one delves into issues of civility, one roams to normative questions:  what is proper and improper behavior?  Do public schools have the responsibility to impart “appropriate” values?  If so, what are those values and from where should they originate?
This whole question of values education deserves a lengthy treatment and this blog will touch on it again, but here, a general observation is that schools, even public schools, do have a responsibility to deal with the normative questions related to civility.  They have a role even if they do not see themselves as having one.[1]  Schools take up a large portion of children’s lives.  To suggest that schools will not have an effect is foolish and to believe that effect should not be responsibly planned for is a professional dereliction.
Back in the 1960s, a set of scholars who attempted to influence what was taught in schools felt that their role was not to totally ignore values questions in the classroom, but to present them in the form of personal value statements[2] or of resolving value dilemmas.[3]  These approaches garnered a bit of popularity at the time and many accompanying instructional materials were sold to or for teachers and students across the country. 
Unfortunately, neither approach met with lasting success.  One apparent reason for the limited tenure as highly regarded instructional strategies was the overall cultural environment in which they were issued.  As this blog has argued, the nation was in the throes of institutionalizing a natural rights view of government and politics.  “Do your own thing” was the prevailing motto of the day and the proposed curricular offerings did not address this cultural drift.
All in all, these strategies did not meet with much success and they have generally, through the years, been abandoned.  What remained was an almost total abandonment of handling values issues in the classroom, at least in a thoughtful fashion.
This left a vacuum that has been filled by two sources.  One has been the all-pervasive media and its implied values.  The other has been the young people themselves.  This latter source has often played out in the context of a youth culture becoming ever more pervasive, especially in large urban comprehensive high schools.[4]  The result:  a highly narcissistic and self-absorbed youth population.[5]
Are Americans suffering from undue levels of incivility?  Robert D. Putnam,[6] among others,[7] found worrisome levels of uncivil behavior among the American public.  These scholars are not alone in this finding or concern.  Other sources, both professional social scientists and popular media reports, echo his message.  Public Agenda, in 2002, reported:  “Most Americans surveyed in a study released today say rudeness is on the rise in our society and 41 percent admit they too are sometimes a part of the problem.[8] 
Similar reports date back to the 1990s.[9]  But the 1990s or, for that matter, 2002, has been a long time ago.  Are things better today?  A 2013 study found:  70 percent of Americans saw incivility as a national crisis, and on average, Americans encountered social interactions that they considered uncivil 2.4 times daily; 43 percent expected to experience incivility within 24 hours, and 50 percent reported ending a friendship due to uncivil behavior.
Summarizing this research:  “Civility in America continues to erode and rude behavior is becoming our “new normal,” according to the fourth annual study on Civility in America:  A Nationwide Survey, conducted by [a] global public relations firm … .”[10]
Then, a few years ago, comedians Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert staged a rally in Washington D. C. whose main message was a call to restore civility to this nation’s political discourse.  The rally, described by the New York Times as “the enormous crowd, which stretched from the Capitol almost to the Washington Monument”[11] was covered live by C-Span.  In short, the rally hit a responsive chord.  And then there were the presidential campaigns of 2016 with physical violence becoming part of the expected occurrences. 
To end this account of incivility, here is a telling, contemporary statistic:  56% of all fatal traffic accidents involve at least one of the drivers exhibiting aggressive driving – better known as road rage.[12]




[1] The Academy Awards winner of best picture (awarded February, 2017 was Moonlight.  The film is the story of an inner city, predominately African-American school in Miami (Liberty City).  Some of the scenes depict what goes on in the public school that the characters attend.  That depiction is accurate and demonstrates what happens when a school does not take an active role in instilling civic values – what this blog has called social capital.

[2]  Louis E. Raths, Merrill Harmin, Sidney B. Simon, Values and Teaching (Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1966).

[3] Donald W. Oliver and James P. Shaver, Teaching Public Issues in the High School (Boston, MA:  Houghton Mifflin Company, 1966).

[4] Lawrence Steinberg, Adolescence, (New York, NY:  McGraw-Hill, 2008).

[5] Jean M. Twenge and W. Keith Campbell, The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement.

[6] Robert D. Putnam, Bowling alone:  The collapse and revival of American community

[7] Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen,William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton, The Good Society, (New York, NY:  Alfred A. Knopf, 1991).

[8] Public Agenda, Aggravating Circumstances: A Status Report on Rudeness in America, Public Agenda, 2002, http://www.publicagenda.org/files/aggravating_circumstances.pdf .

[9] A review of this literature includes the following: Concerned Educators Allied for a Safe Environment (CEASE). The Effect of Violence on Children’s Lives (Information Sheet # 10). New York: Teacher College Press, 2000; Gest, T. and Pope, V. (1996, March 25). Crime time bomb. U. S. News and World Report. pp. 28-36; Ellis, B. E. (1996, June/July). Why kids are ruining America. George. pp. 96-98 & 128; Newsweek. “The Rap on Rap.” (October 9) (2000): 58-65.  This is just a small sample.


[10] Weber Shandwick, “Civility in America 2013:  Incivility Has Reached Crisis Levels,” Newsroom, (2013):  http://www.webershandwick.com/news/article/civility-in-america-2013-incivility-has-reached-crisis-levels AND A FOLLOW-UP ARTICLE Weber Shandwick, “Civility in America 2014:  Forecast Bleak but with Glimmer of Hope for Millennials,” Newsroom, (2014):  https://www.webershandwick.com/news/article/civility-in-america-2014-forecast-bleak-but-with-hope-for-millennials .

[11] Sabrina Tavernise & Brian Stelter, “At Rally, Thousands – Billions? - Responded,” New York Times (New York, NY), October 30, 2010, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/us/politics/31rally.html?_r=1&hp .

[12] NBC News, “Road Rage,” NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, July 14, 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment