A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

A DRUG PROBLEM INITIATED


This is the second posting reporting the development of a civics unit of study regarding the opioids epidemic.  This development is in real time and this posting will begin looking at the history of the epidemic.  In reviewing that history, it is useful to make a distinction; a distinction that is no longer observed.  Historically, people used the term opiates to indicate all drugs derived from opium.  Later, the term, opioids, was used to distinguish between opiates from synthetic opiates.  Today, the term, opioids, is generally used to include both categories.
          This posting makes this distinction because this history of “opioids” stretches back to the nineteenth century when opiates were introduced to the US.  During the Civil War, morphine, an opiate, was an effective pain reliever.  Afterwards, the famous company, Bayar (as in Bayar aspirin) sold heroin (1898 to 1910) as a cough-suppressant; claiming it was non-addictive.
Apparently, experience with it proved otherwise and in due time concern among doctors were expressed by their increased reluctance to prescribe opiates. Shortly after, the US Congress enacted the Harrison Narcotics Act in 1914 which imposed a tax on opiates and, still later, the Anti-Heroin Act of 1924.  In this latter legislation, Congress made the importation or manufacturing of heroin illegal.[1]
In terms of general awareness among Americans, it was, at that time, quite limited.  One can detect during the 1950s a belief that an addiction problem existed among jazz musicians but not a problem affecting typical Americans.  Instead, the mere presence of heroin in the country was considered a frightening condition but limited to small groups within the population.[2]  As a young person, this writer can remember this general aversion to illegal drugs.
Then, during the years of Vietnam protest, there seems to have been a shift in public opinion.  In the 1960s and 1970s, one could readily detect the popularization of drugs among certain segments of the population – such as, on college campuses.  Chief among the favored drugs was marijuana and hallucinatory drugs, aka psychedelics.  The consumption of these drugs became common and, in popular media, often referred to and depicted.  There was even a much-highlighted event in which drug taking was featured; i.e., the Woodstock music festival.[3]
The war in Vietnam became a contributing factor since soldiers, coming home, often came with addictions, such as on heroin.  In Vietnam, these drugs were easily acquired.  In addition, there were highly publicized events, including the overdose death of Janis Joplin, that furthered the general awareness of the problem.  How extensive was drug-use among returning soldiers?  A Congressional report stated that 10 to 15 percent of returning vets were addicted to heroin.
This drew the attention of the president; he, President Nixon, declared drug abuse as the nation’s number one enemy.[4]  And the noted statistics did not undermine the conclusion.  In 1973 the estimate was that 1.5 deaths per 100,000 population were due to overdoses.[5]  What was not known, at the time, was that this level of drug-taking was only an introduction to what was to follow.  The next posting will continue this history and how the emphasis shifted to prescribed opioids.


[1] Sonia Moghe, “Opioid History:  From ‘Wonder Drug’ to Abuse Epidemic,” CNN, October 14, 2016, accessed June 18, 2018, https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/12/health/opioid-addiction-history/ .

[2] Christopher Caldwell, “American Carnage:  The Landscape of Opioid Addiction,” First Things, April 2017, accessed June 18, 2018, https://www.firstthings.com/article/2017/04/american-carnage .

[3] Ibid.

[4] “Interview:  Dr. Robert DuPont,” Frontline, 2014 (estimated), accessed June 18, 2018, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/drugs/interviews/dupont.html .

[5] Christopher Caldwell, “American Carnage:  The Landscape of Opioid Addiction.”

No comments:

Post a Comment