A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, July 20, 2018

AMERICANS AS THE CAUSE, I


[Note:  This posting is a continuation of a report on the development of a civics unit of study.  This unit is directing students to formulate informed positions on the opioid epidemic.  Presently, this development, in real time, is reporting a set of factoids on the responsibilities Americans bear for its tragic consequences.]
The last posting that addressed the opioid epidemic, July 13, 2018, a brief description was given on how modest amounts of abusing prescribed doses of opioids can easily lead to addiction.  This posting will begin looking at the responsibility consumers of opioids have in causing the accompanying epidemic.  Central to understanding this addiction problem is to gather a sense of its magnitude.  And this has led observers to the eyepopping numbers of people being addicted. 
A few of those numbers give one a sense to the extent this epidemic has grown.  Initially, opioid consumption did not begin on its own impetus; Americans did not wake up one morning and decide to take these drugs.  Reacting to the reported incidence of chronic pain in the late 1990s – in the neighborhood of 100 million people – both the drug companies and the federal government began to encourage these afflicted people to take painkilling opioids.[1] 
To what degree?  Here is part of the statistics:  from 1991 to 2011 prescriptions rose from 76 million per year to 219 million and then to 289 million in the year 2016.[2]
          As this volume rose, the numbers of people being treated for substance abuse followed as well as those of deaths due to opioid overdoses – as reported in previous postings.  Not surprising given the fact that from 2002 to 2012 the rate of drug users being prescribed drugs more powerful than morphine jumped from one-in-six drug users to one-in-three.  Most common drugs prescribed were oxycodone and hydrocodone.[3]
          An angle to this problem that has been given little attention is how Americans dispense healthcare.  This nation’s system often leaves individuals to obtain private insurance and, in turn, these companies heavily favor drug treatment over costly therapies.  According to the expert, Judith Feinberg of West Virginia University, “Most insurance, especially for poor people, won’t pay for anything but a pill.”[4]  This bias places the US with a 40 percent higher rate of prescribing opioids than Germany or Canada.[5]
          Another expert from University of Utah, Josef Stehlik, chimes in: 
Opioids are treated differently [in the US].  First, there’s much less prescription of opioid for pain in Europe, so there’s less chance of addiction from people who started opioid use in a legal, medical way.  Second, in many but not all European countries, the rate of illicit opioid use is either stagnant or decreasing.[6]
And one can ask:  does this prescription rate in the US lead to less reported incidences of pain?  Given that with the increase of opioid prescriptions there has been a decrease in non-opioid prescriptions, such as for aspirin or ibuprofen, has there been noted change in reported pain?  In the US, the answer is no.  This has caused many to question the curative effectiveness of opioids.[7]
With these factoids established, one can better answer the question with which this posting began:  what is the responsibility of Americans in causing the outbreak of this epidemic?  This blog will take up the rest of the answer in the next posting.


[1] “America’s Opioid Epidemic Is Worsening,” The Economist, March 6, 2017, accessed July 19, 2018, https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/03/06/americas-opioid-epidemic-is-worsening .

[2] “Opioid Epidemic,” Wikipedia, accessed July 18, 2018, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opioid_epidemic .

[3] “America’s Opioid Epidemic Is Worsening,” The Economist.  Of note:  oxycodone sells under the brand name OxyContin or Percocet and hydrocodone under Vicodin.

[4] Owen Amos, “Why Opioids Are Such an American Problem,” BBC, October 25, 2017, accessed July 19, 2018, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41701718 .

[5] Amanda Erickson, “Opioid Abuse in the U. S. Is so Bad It’s Lowering Life Expectancy:  Why Hasn’t the Epidemic Hit Other Countries?,”  Washington Post, December 28, 2017, accessed July 19, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/12/28/opioid-abuse-in-america-is-so-bad-its-lowering-our-life-expectancy-why-hasnt-the-epidemic-hit-other-countries/?utm_term=.c5d14bc5db2c .

[6] Ed Cara, “The U. S. Opioid Crisis Is So Devasting, It’s Made More Organ Available for Transplant,” Gizmodo, May 16, 2018, https://gizmodo.com/the-u-s-opioid-crisis-is-so-devastating-its-made-more-1826053571 .

[7] Matthew Daubresse, Hsien-Yen Chang, Yuping Yu, and George Caleb Alexander, “Ambulatory Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Malignant Pain in the United States, 2000-2010,” Medical Care, vol. 51, no. 10, October, 2013, accessed July 19, 2018, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256500618_Ambulatory_Diagnosis_and_Treatment_of_Non-Malignant_Pain_in_the_United_States_2000-2010 , AND Robert Gebolhoff, “The Opioid Epidemic Could Turn into a Pandemic If We’re Not Careful,” Washington Post, February 9, 2017 AND “Facing Addiction in America,” U. S. Surgeon General (SurgeonGeneral.com), 2016, site page no longer posted, see https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/executive-summary .  Reported decreases of prescribed non-opioids range from 38% to 29%.

No comments:

Post a Comment