A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, March 29, 2019

TALKING: GOOD OR BAD?


This blog has various writers it recurrently cites; but it has a special place of honor for Alexi de Tocqueville – along with Daniel J. Elazar.  Some time ago, it included in an earlier posting, an extended quote from Tocqueville.  The quote is from his famous “travel log” of a visit to America in the 1830s.  Here is part of that citation:
It is not impossible to form an imaginary picture of the surpassing liberty which the Americans enjoy; some idea may likewise be formed of the extreme equality which subsists amongst them.  But the political activity which pervades the United States must be seen in order to be understood.  No sooner do you set foot upon the American soil than you are stunned by a kind of tumult; a confused clamour is heard on every side; and a thousand simultaneous voices demand the immediate satisfaction of their social wants … Meetings are called for the sole purpose of declaring their disapprobation of the line of conduct pursued by the Government, whilst in other assemblies the citizens salute the authorities of the day as the fathers of their country … This feeling pervades the most trifling habits of life; even the women frequently attend public meetings, and listen to political harangues as a recreation after their household labours.  Debating clubs are to a certain extent a substitute for theatrical entertainments.  An American cannot converse, but he can discuss; and when he attempts to talk he falls into a dissertation.  He speaks to you as if he was addressing a meeting; and if he should chance to warm in the course of the discussion, he will infallibly say “Gentlemen,” to the person with whom he is conversing.[1]
This writer described this description of a people as the best example of a people being federated among themselves, he has ever read.
          One can characterize these citizens as readily disposed to talking to each other.  This dialoguing helped the writer come up with an instructional approach, again, described previously in an earlier posting, “Some Generic Elements of Debate.”[2]  The point here is that the use of federation theory to guide civics instruction calls on students to talk and talk a lot – just like Americans did in the 1830s.
          It seems that a natural rights guru thinks differently.  Robert Greene, in his best-selling book, The 48 Laws of Power, has the following advice:
When you are trying to impress people with words, the more you say, the more common you appear, and the less in control.  Even if you are saying something banal, it will seem original if you make it vague, open-ended, and sphinxlike.  Powerful people impress and intimidate by saying less.  The more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolish.[3]
Greene offers three main examples supporting his advice, one non-example, a c. 450 BC, Roman warrior, Coriolanus, and two positive examples, King Louis XIV of France, and Andy Warhol, the twentieth-century artist.
          Coriolanus, who had spent the bulk of his career engaging in battles away from Rome, finally decided to venture into Roman politics and submitted himself to an election for consul (the highest position of the Roman Republic).  He didn’t win and almost talked himself into being executed by what he had to say in a couple of speeches – verbal attacks on the common folk.  Without these outbursts, historians, according to Greene, believe he would have won easily.
          King Louis often said nothing but “I shall see” to his ministers and, by doing so, kept them wondering and anxious as to what he was going to do.  Their imbalance weakened them and strengthened Louis.  How?  The advisors, to fill in the silence, blabbed on and revealed more about themselves to their detriment.  Oh yes, Louis is also famous for one other thing he said, “L’etat, c’est moi” (“I am the state”).
          And finally, Andy Warhol followed the example of another artist, Marcel Duchamp, “who realized early on that the less he said about his work, the more people talked about it.  And the more they talked, the more valuable his work became.”[4]  Consequently, Warhol was noted more for his glare into a camera lens than any wisdom uttered from his mouth.
          Of course, Greene is writing for the benefit of businessmen who want to become more powerful and, therefore, richer.  Tocqueville wanted to describe what was becoming a vibrant republic that was guided among its citizens by a view of governance and politics; that being federalism.  The claim here is:  civics teachers are truer to their responsibilities if they use Tocqueville, instead of Greene, to guide their efforts in the classroom.


[2] Robert Gutierrez, “Some Generic Elements of Debate,” Gravitas:  A Voice for Civics, October 3, 2017, accessed March 28, 2019, https://gravitascivics.blogspot.com/2017/10/some-generic-elements-of-debates.html .

[3] Robert Greene, The 48 Laws of Power.  (New York, NY:  Penguin Books, 1998), 31.

[4] Ibid., 35.

No comments:

Post a Comment