Early
on in this blog I made the argument that the levels of civility and
criminality of this nation, when compared to our historical levels,
are high and that that unfortunate state of affairs reflects poorly
on our civics education efforts. A recent case, while anecdotal,
illustrates my concern.
The
case I am referring to is the rape case in Steubenville, Ohio. In
this case, two local high school football players were charged and
convicted of rape. Rape is a heartbreaking and emotional disaster
for the victim and the victim's family. Unfortunately, rape cases
are too frequent to attract much attention. In terms of both actual
numbers and rates of reported cases, the United States ranks very
high when compared to other nations.1
How this compares to our historical levels I don't know, but I would
guess that current levels are not lower. Beyond the obvious problems
with this crime is getting a handle on how often it occurs since
victims are often reluctant to report it. This is due to shame or,
since perpetrators too often can be family members or husbands,
concern for the resulting animosities such reporting can induce.
But
in terms of my concerns in this blog, the facts surrounding the
Steubenville case are particularly relevant. Apparently, the guilt
of the two boys was secured because they and others, using mobile
phones and social media, made this crime so public. And since the
two boys were (are) local heroes due to their football prowess, the
girl who was victimized by the sex crime was further victimized by
being the subject of abuse for “causing” all the problems
visiting these young men. News reports seem to indicate that such
feelings were amply shared by members of that community. The town
has a population of fewer than 20,000. I can only guess that pride
in the football team is deeply felt by town members and that the
facts surrounding the case are probably causing high degrees of
dissonance. But to not be able to see beyond the superficial
importance of a local high school team, superficial when compared to
the seriousness of the rape, one must question the expressed
priorities of many members of this community.
Given
the geographic location of the town and the fact that the town is
described as economically strapped, I imagine that the town has been
hit by the exit of manufacturing in what we call the “rust belt.”
Of course, if this be the case, it explains, not excuses, an
obsession over a successful local team. The condition adds context
to the reaction that community members are expressing over the fate
of these two young men. Also adding context is the fact that the
young lady who was the victim was highly inebriated and can't
remember what happened that night. But such conditions did not seem
to affect the judge's decision.
Judge
Thomas Lipps expressed concern over the nature of the crime:
I
came in early this morning and I closely examined all the evidence
and I re-read all the text messages that were admitted in this case.
Many of the things that we learned during this trial, that our
children were saying and doing, were profane, were ugly, with alcohol
consumption shown as a particular danger to our teenage youth … .2
The
convicted, Trent Mays, 17, and Ma'lik Richmond, 16, seemed truly
sorry for their actions after the verdict was rendered and before the
sentencing was announced. So pathetic was their behavior that it
elicited sympathy for them. Of course, this reaction caused another
counter-reaction which basically cried out for people not to forget
who the true victim was – a sixteen year old girl.
All
of this is damning. It holds the two young men in an obviously
despicable standing. But I and others believe it reflects a serious
shortcoming in so many others. And it is this latter aspect of the
case which draws my attention. Judge Lipps and, later, the state's
attorney general voiced the concern that the case highlights profound
shortcomings in how we instill in our young people the perceptions
and attitudes regarding sex and basic human dignity. State Attorney
General Mike DeWine was so concerned that he announced he will be
convening a grand jury to investigate the case to seek out others who
might have committed crimes. His decision to call the grand jury
seems to be influenced by the social media evidence the trial
utilized. In a statement he said,
A
grand jury is an investigative tool that is uniquely suited to ensure
fairness and to complete this investigation. And this community
needs assurance that no stone has been left unturned in our search
for the truth … . Rape is not a recreational activity. We, as a
society, have an obligation [to] do more to educate our young people
about rape. They need to know it is a horrible crime of violence.
And it is simply not ok.3
And
there lies the civics education angle as well as demands on other
parts of the school curriculum.
1See
web cite http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics
.
2Red,
C. and Thompson, T. (2013). Steubenville rape case: Victims hope
one day to forgive Trent May & Ma'Lik Richmond, who were found
guilty in rape of 16-year-old by Ohio judge. Daily News,
March 17,
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/steubenville-high-school-football-players-found-guilty-rape-16-year-old-judge-article-1.1291087.
3Ibid.
No comments:
Post a Comment