A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

MAINTAINING

This posting is the last of a series of postings in which I am presenting a set of functions a group needs to fulfill in order for it to be a federated group.[1]  A federated group is a group that is made up of individuals or groups that come together and formulate a collective to accomplish stated purposes and to be united under the provisions of a covenant or compact.  For such a group to be viable and able to overcome obstacles that stand in its way, the group needs to meet certain functions.  I have, to date, identified four such functions:  producing, adapting, sophisticating, and liberating.  These first four functions were derived from the concerns expressed by Samuel P. Huntington;[2] the fifth function, which I am presenting in this posting, stems from my interest in civics.  The reason that civics is essential to our nation, our political system – a federated group – pertains to this function I am calling maintaining.

This fifth function is a concern that takes a group in a different direction from those of the other four functions.  The first four functions tend to point a group toward change.  Whether the effort is toward producing or becoming more sophisticated or seeking autonomy (liberating), the group dedicates energy toward looking for different ways of doing things, toward change.  But in the case of maintaining, the focus is dedicated toward keeping that which exists.  This bias is particularly true when it comes to basic values which determine a group’s structure, processes and, most important, ideals.  As such, there are two main processes in which the maintaining function is satisfied:  recruitment and socialization.

In order to maintain those key elements of a group, a group needs to have the right people in the right positions.  It needs these people to have the skills – both technical and social – knowledge, motivations, and energy to accomplish the roles the position demands.  Of course, this presupposes that the group has met the sophisticating function sufficiently well so that the appropriate roles have been identified and the structural elements have been put in place to begin with.  But given that this has been done, then a group needs the right type of person to fill the position.

The other process is socialization.  Here is where civics is so important.  A federated group needs to teach and promote those elements of knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, and commitment that support the basic values of the group – values that are reflected in its founding covenant or compact.  This can be tricky in that federated groups will most likely be committed to progressing toward more equality and liberty.  Given the nature of social life, as social conditions change in a group’s environment, a group will be challenged to adapt to new demands.  Through these changes, a group will be tempted to change its basic commitments.  This makes it imperative to value, as a basic value, change itself, but without selling out and changing its founding values.  One can change, but one should not sacrifice who one is and this extends to groups.  If the demand is to make such a change, then it might be time for the group to terminate.

A teacher who wants students to analyze a group’s performance regarding the function, maintaining, might ask the following questions:
By which process are new members to the group identified and allowed into the group?
Does the group evaluate the performance of its members to hold up its basic commitments and take steps to shore up any deficiencies stemming from poor performances?
Are effective processes in place that accommodate unanticipated turnover in group membership?
Are members taught those elements of skill, knowledge, attitudes, and values central to the foundation of the group?  Is the group effective in teaching those elements?
Are members effectively encouraged to support the group’s basic values, beliefs, and commitments?
As with the other functions, these suggested questions are not meant to be an exhaustive list.  The reasons for such a study will probably determine what specific questions an educator will ask.



[1] I will in my next posting summarize the functions and reprint the questions associated with each function.

[2] Huntington, S. P.  (1968).  Political order in changing societies.  New Haven, CT:  Yale University Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment