A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, July 3, 2015

A NEWER CHAOS

With the Greek financial crisis and the possible termination of that nation’s membership in the ill-defined European Union,[1] the state of the international order is precarious at best.  Gone is the relatively stable, albeit dangerous, international arena of the Cold War.  The great powers are presently losing their ability to establish order and that includes the United States.  So says international relations expert, Randall L. Schweller, in his recently published book, Maxwell’s Demon And the Golden Apple:  Global Discord in the New Millennium.[2]  That world of international actors seems to be spiraling into chaos or, at least, a more chaotic state.  While I must admit my lack of expertise in this area, it is one civics teachers should address.  Schweller’s book is a source that can assist teachers in that effort.

This increasing chaos is a newer sort of disruption.  Despite the tensions between Russia and the Western democracies over Ukraine and the Baltic states – where Russia is making noises of expansion over stated perceptions of NATO expansion – Schweller does not foresee war between super powers as likely.  What Schweller is more concerned about is the entropy of power due to the array of international actors that now dot that landscape.  Added to this is the deterioration of US hegemony in relation to these actors.  He describes this condition as:  “erratic, unsettled, and devoid of behavioral regularities.” (p. ix)  His description includes: 
… new actors – regional and global organizations, local militias, global crime and terrorist networks, nongovernmental organizations, and large corporations – are emerging to compete with states, each exerting a different kind of power …[3]

On a recent car trip, I listened to a BBC broadcast in which a woman was being interviewed.  She described how she, here in the US, was lured into believing the propaganda of ISIS.  Apparently, ISIS operatives have become quite skilled in using social media platforms to establish intimate relations with would-be converts, preying on the subjects’ insecurities and social isolations.  As described, these efforts, seemed quite sophisticated.  We do know that terrorist groups have been able to recruit significant numbers of fighters for their aggressions in Syria and Iraq.  The array of volunteers does not fit a simple profile.  There are the social misfits, but there are also those who seem to have been leading successful lives.  Motivations among these recruits vary and this, in turn, makes addressing the problem that more difficult.  In any event, civics teachers should be concerned that before them might be potential converts to fundamentalist allure of Islamic extremists as well as extremists of other persuasions.  Included in this list of potential recruiters can be hate groups or extreme ideologically-bent groups.  What seems to be losing its grip is the uniting force provided by nation-state legitimacy, at least, in relative terms.

Perceived dysfunction among state entities does not mean only a lack of satisfactory governmental services.  Dysfunction of this type creates vacuums – political vacuums – and these will be filled.  How?  The case of chaotic forces as described above can and, in the extreme, will demonstrate how those vacuums will be filled.



[1] Ill-defined in that the union has limited governmental authority in financial matters.  The Union has no central bank, for example.

[2] Schweller, R. L.  (2014).  Maxwell’s demon and the golden apple:  Global discord in the new millennium.  Baltimore, MD:  John Hopkins University Press.  For a informative review of this book see Kirshner, J.  (2015).  Book review.  Political Science Quarterly, 130 (1), Spring, pp. 133-134.

[3] Ibid., p. 55.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

NOT DOING ONE’S PART

Central to the aims of this blog is to promote a federalist construct – liberated federalism – to guide the curricular choices that civics educators make.  Why?  Because federalism, at its core, stands for the power of collectives.  Collectives get things done efficiently.  Forming collectives is a way to pool the resources of various parties, be they individuals or other collectives.  They open up possible projects out of the reach of individuals.  But anyone who has ever been part of a collective – and that’s all of us – has been frustrated by the obstacles that collectives encounter.  Sometimes the obstacles are just part of the challenge a project presents, but other times they are the product of having to deal with others.  I have presented the progression – groups, organizations, associations – before, as a way to point out that collectives vary in degrees of bonding among their members.  As our experiences within our family and other social groupings indicate, the level to which the members feel affinity for each other will affect how successfully the particular collective functions.  The higher the affinity, the more likely that success is achieved.

Affinity is, in turn, affected by the levels of trust that exist, the communication patterns enjoyed among members, clear roles, and respect.  Surely, as collectives grow in size, affinity becomes a harder quality to secure.  Knowing those you are dealing with ups the chances you will care about them and be willing to cooperate in your mutual efforts.  There are probably other factors, but I believe you get the idea.  But in addition to intergroup dynamics, there are other factors:  resource availability, legitimacy of intent, timing, and so on.  Let me focus on one such problem area:  free-rider or cheap-rider.

Again, I have written about the free-rider problem before.  But this posting is more in regard to how free-riding affects the efforts of collectives.  This concern has been brought to my attention in an article by Andrew B. Kennedy.[1] He gives an analysis of the extent that China is a free-rider when it comes to contributing to collective, international efforts to secure and maintain open sea passages from piracy, especially in transporting oil, and in fighting terrorism.  China benefits from international policing, but the question remains whether China contributes in terms of financing or applying actual military assets which would be mostly naval assets.  Kennedy claims China does provide some assistance and is limited in its capacity to contribute, but that it could do more.  In such cases, one does not have free-riding, but cheap-riding.  What are the consequences of such “cheapness?”  In either case, being free or cheap leads to mistrust and resentment.

This whole treatment of the free-rider problem reminded me of my classroom experiences.  I often assigned group work and a lot of my time was taken up by devising ways to make each member of a group accountable for helping rather than just riding along and getting credit for the work of others.  This is apparently part of the human condition:  a significant number of people will tend to enjoy the labor of others and not feel sufficiently compelled to contribute to that labor if they don’t have to.  It is equally part of the human condition to resent providing labor that benefits those who don’t contribute.  Be it nations or just any social group, people will tend to feel as if they are being taken advantage of if this type of asymmetry exists and they are on the working end of the relationship.

As for civics, this whole train of questions as to whether a particular party benefits from the efforts of others is worth asking.  Not to give credence to the charges of Tea Party types, but I believe a lot of the motivation for their efforts is to rectify the level of assistance that is given to those who accept welfare but don’t do their share of the work that permits our public policy to provide the assistance.  Of course, this is overstated; it might be a rationalization of their resentment for paying the taxes that pay for the assistance.  We can’t ignore that this line of argument does readily garner agreement among many.  This seems to indicate that at times this whole problem of free-rider can be a “slogan” for those who want to welch on their responsibilities to meet the challenges that providing for the general welfare present.  If the aim is to promote federalist values, problems such as free-rider or cheap-rider need to be addressed and students should work to devise solutions to this problem.  This is true whether we are considering those cases where there is actual shirking of responsibility or where there are manufactured cases of such shirking.



[1] Kennedy, A. B.  (2015).  China and the free-rider problem:  Exploring the case of energy security.  Political Science Quarterly, 130 (1), Spring, pp. 27-50.