A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, August 10, 2018

OTHER STATE REACTIONS


[Note:  This posting is a continuation of a report on the development of a civics unit of study.  This unit is directing students to formulate informed positions on the opioid epidemic.  It is being developed in real time.  Writer wants to express gratitude to Wikipedia for identifying the bulk of the research this blog has used in the development of this unit.[1]]
As already reported there have been trans-state efforts to meet the opioid crisis.  Another such effort was initiated in early 2018.  A number of senators wrote a letter to President Trump expressing their concern that the president was not giving the epidemic enough attention.  The letter charged that the White House Office of Nation Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) has shown a lack of oversight in the nation’s coordination of policy to meet the fentanyl, heroin, opioid epidemic.
          Among the evidence the letter cites is the fact that there has not been in both the ONDCP and the DEA a permanent, confirmed leadership since the Trump administration has taken office.  This is due to the fact the Administration has not submitted qualified candidates for those positions.  The letter obviously asked for such candidates to be submitted not only for those two agencies but for the Department of Justice, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and other positions.[2]
          There is some good news associated with state efforts.  According to targeted research,[3] life-saving use of a new treatment, Buprenorphine, are being used in state efforts.  The comparison research has shown that increased use of this treatment has lowered death rates among opioid addicts.  This was determined by comparing the efforts of various states.
          In terms of this treatment, there is also the case study of France.  There, Buprenorphine, which has been part of the established treatment for opioid addiction for decades, has lowered the death rate due to opioid by 79% over a four-year period.  Today, 64% of opioid user in France use this drug to curb cravings and, consequently, reduce overdosing.[4]
          This ends this review of state/local efforts.  This unit of study should emphasize local efforts and the information in this and the previous posting is meant to get student efforts started.  Generally, the judgement here is that states and local authorities have not been energetic enough.  As a reminder, over 42,000 people die every year due to this epidemic; that’s 116 a day.  Next topic in this blog will be federal government efforts in addressing this tragic epidemic.
[P.S.:  Update on some previously reported factoids and insights: 
·        Purdue Pharma was aware of the addictive qualities of opioid drugs well before this quality was generally known.[5]
·        The pharmaceutical industry spent around $46 million in marketing opioids in mainly payments to doctors.  This payed off in ensuing years as the industry enjoyed profits of $14.7 billion due to the selling of these drugs.[6]
·        Early use of the opioids, beyond their then primary use in treating terminal patients, began in injury prone areas of the nation where agriculture and coal mining are chief employment avenues.][7]



[1] The writer also wants to state that where possible, he has checked the sources and has at times added to the listed research.

[2] The letter was signed by Senators Maggie W. Hassen, Edward Markey, Dianne Feinstein, Sheldon Whitehouse, Richard Blumenthal, Catherine Cortez Masto, Sherod Brown, Jeanne Shaheen, Tammy Balwin, and Elizabeth Warren and dated January 17,2018.

[3] German Lopez, “The States Taking the Opioid Epidemic Seriously (and Not), in One Map,” Vox, February 22, 2018, accessed August 9, 2018, https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/22/17037346/opioid-epidemic-state-policy-map .  The research was conducted by Avalere Health.

[4] “This Opioid Addiction Treatment Helped France Combat Its Own Epidemic,” NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, posted on Facebook July 25, 2018, accessed August 10, 2018, https://www.facebook.com/nbcnightlynews/videos/this-opioid-addiction-treatment-helped-france-combat-its-own-epidemic/10156761894368689/ .

[5] MSNBC Live with Velshi and Ruhle, August 9, 2018.  The portion of the broadcast dedicated to this topic consisted mostly of an interview with author, Beth Macy, as she spoke of her recently published book, Dopesick:  Dealers, Doctors, and the Drug Company that Addicted America (August 2018).

[6] Ibid.

[7] Ibid.

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

STATES REACT TO OPIOID CRISIS


[Note:  This posting is a continuation of a report on the development of a civics unit of study.  This unit is directing students to formulate informed positions on the opioid epidemic.  Writer wants to express gratitude to Wikipedia for identifying the bulk of the research this blog has used in the development of this unit.[1]]
After sharing a short history and a list of factoids and insights regarding the opioid crisis/epidemic, this blog will now report on how government has reacted to the challenge opioids represent.  In true federalist fashion, this review will begin with a look at what the state governments have done.
          The main reaction has been legislation to block those prescribing protocols that have led to “high-risk” prescribing practices.  For example, there are now laws against doctors and clinics from prescribing the drug on long-term bases.  Summarily, there have been four categories of laws:
·        Laws mandating that those receiving prescriptions sign-up to a database record known as the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP).  This is a statewide record and it includes the names of all patients who are being prescribed “controlled substance” drugs.
·        Laws mandating that anytime a prescriber – doctor or clinic worker – is about to prescribe an opioid, he/she is to check the PDMP.
·        Laws limiting the amount and duration over which these drugs can be prescribed.
·        Regulation laws that establish the necessity to monitor clinics – some known as “pill mills” – to drastically decrease the number of opioid prescriptions they issue.  This is particularly aiming at non-medical prescriptions.[2]
These developments should be added to the short history of the crisis already reported in this blog.
          As for factoids, the following is offered:
·        Governors of 45 states and 3 territorial governors organized themselves, in July 2016, to draw up an agreement, “Compact to Fight Opioid Addiction.”  The compact calls on the governors to coordinate their actions to help end the crisis.  This includes policies to address both governmental and private activities and protocols.  Special attention should be given to how the compact focuses on opioid producers and doctors.[3]
·        After the state of Maryland experienced about 2,000 deaths from opioid overdoses in 2016, the governor declared, in March 2017, a state of emergency.  Practically, that declaration meant coordination between state authorities and those of local jurisdictions.[4]
·        Other states that have introduced and/or enacted legislation to fight the opioid crisis have been Deleware,[5] Michigan, including instituting the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS) which mirrored the efforts of PDMP,[6] Maine,[7] Utah,[8] West Virginia,[9] and Washington.[10]  Of special note, Texas officials are focusing their efforts on pill mills,[11] and Washington filed suit, in 2017, against Purdue Pharma for related negligence in their marketing activities associated with opioids.[12]
·        Another special case is that of Arizona.  There, early in 2018, Governor Doug Ducey signed into law the Arizona Opioid Epidemic Act.  This act makes available $10 million to treat those who have been victimized by the ill effects of the drug.  It also limits patients, with exemptions, to five-dose-prescriptions.[13]
As for generalizations, there seems to be two:
·        State governments have been moved to act, including the legislating of laws, by the numbers of overdoses, deaths, and costs their citizens have suffered because of the increased prescribing and consumption of opioid drugs.  Illustrative example is that of Arizona that suffered in the Phoenix area 3,114 overdoses from mid-June 2017 to the end of January 2018.  That situation led to the enactment of the Arizona Opioid Epidemic Act (see above).[14]
·        State action has seemed to have positive effects on controlling the prescribing of opioids as exemplified by both Florida (previously noted in this blog) and Texas.[15]
Next posting will pickup this review of state actions.


[1] The writer also wants to state that where possible, he has checked the sources and has at times added to the listed research.

[2]  Emma E. McGinty, Elizabeth A. Stuart, Alexander G. Caleb, Colleen L. Barry, Mark C. Bicket, and Lainie Rutkow, “Protocol:  Mixed-Methods Study to Evaluate Implementation, Enforcement, and Outcomes of U. S. State Laws Intended to Curb High-Risk Opioid Prescribing,” Implementation Science, vol. 13, no. 1, accessed August 6, 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828404/ .

[3] “A Compact to Fight Opioid Addiction,” National Governors Association, July 13, 2016, cite no longer on-line AND Gale Pryor, “6 Ways States Are Fighting the Opioid Epidemic,” Athenainsight, May 19, 2017, accessed August 6, 2018, https://www.athenahealth.com/insight/6-ways-states-are-fighting-opioid-epidemic .

[4]  “Hogan-Rutherford Administration Declares State of Emergency, Announces Major Funding to Combat Heroin and Opioid Crisis in Maryland,” Office of Governor Larry Hogan, March 1, 2017, accessed August 6, 2018, http://governor.maryland.gov/2017/03/01/hogan-rutherford-administration-declares-state-of-emergency-announces-major-funding-to-combat-heroin-and-opioid-crisis-in-maryland/ AND Bill Turque, “Maryland Governor Declares State of Emergency for Opioid Crisis, The Washington Post, March 1, 2017, accessed August 6, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/hogan-declares-opioid-state-of-emergency/2017/03/01/5c22fcfa-fe2f-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.b47c113320ff AND Pat Warren, “Gov. Hogan Announces Opioid Epidemic State of Emergency,” March 1, 2017, accessed August 6, 2018, https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2017/03/01/gov-hogan-announces-opioid-epidemic-state-of-emergency/ .


[6]  “Governor Snyder Rolls Out Plan to Fight Opioid Addiction,” WILX News, March 23, 2017, accessed August 6, 2018, http://www.wilx.com/content/news/Governor-Snyder-rolls-out-plan-to-fight-opioid-addiction-416981693.html AND Rick Pluta, “Snyder:  Efforts to Stop Opioid Abuse Aren’t Working,” BBC World Service, March 23, 2017, accessed August 6, 2018, http://www.michiganradio.org/post/snyder-efforts-stop-opioid-abuse-aren-t-working .

[7] Christopher Caldwell, “American Carnage:  The Landscape of Opioid Addiction,” First Things, April 2017, accessed June 18, 2018, https://www.firstthings.com/article/2017/04/american-carnage .

[8] “H. B. 299 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Act Amendments – Bill Text,” n. d., accessed August 7, 2018, https://le.utah.gov/~2017/bills/static/HB0299.html AND Alex Stuckey, “Poll:  Many Utahns Know People Who Seek Treatment for Opioid Addiction, but Barriers Remain,” The Salt Lake Tribune, April, 2017, accessed August 7, 2018. http://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=5110951&itype=CMSID .

[9] Scott Higham and Lenny Bernstein, “Opioid Distributors Sued by West Virginia Counties Hit by Drug Crisis,” March 9, 2017, accessed August 7, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/lawsuits-filed-against-drug-distributors-in-west-virginia/2017/03/09/f9e3165e-0501-11e7-b1e9-a05d3c21f7cf_story.html?utm_term=.d34bb4da534a AND Ailsa Chang, “Lawyer behind West Virginia County Lawsuit against Opioid Distributors,” NPR, April 20,2017, accessed August 7, 2018, https://www.npr.org/2017/04/20/524936058/lawyer-behind-west-virginia-county-lawsuit-against-opioid-distributors .

[10]  Note:  this refers to a lawsuit filed by a city, Everett, Washington.  See “U. S. City Sues OxyContin Maker for Contribution to Opioid Crisis,” NPR, February 3, 2017, accessed August 7, 2018,   https://www.npr.org/2017/02/03/513196772/u-s-city-sues-oxycontin-maker-for-contributing-to-opiod-crisis .

[11] Tatyana Lyapustina, Lainie Rutkow, Hsien-Yen Chang, Matthew Daubresse, Alim F. Ramji, Mark Faul, Elizabeth A Stuart, and G. Caleb Alexander, “Effect of a “Pill Mill” Law on Opioid Prescribing and Utilization:  The Case of Texas,” PMC/US National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health, 2016, accessed August 7, 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976392/ .

[12] “U. S. City Sues OxyContin Maker for Contribution to Opioid Crisis,” NPR.

[13] Joan Magtibay, “Ducey Signs Sweeping Law to Confront Arizona Opioid Crisis,” Cronkite News, January 26,2018, accessed August 7, 2018, https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2018/01/26/ducey-signs-sweeping-plan-confront-arizona-opioid-crisis-law/ .

[14] Ibid.

[15] Tatyana Lyapustina, Lainie Rutkow, Hsien-Yen Chang, Matthew Daubresse, Alim F. Ramji, Mark Faul, Elizabeth A Stuart, and G. Caleb Alexander, “Effect of a “Pill Mill” Law on Opioid Prescribing and Utilization:  The Case of Texas.”