A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, May 11, 2018

UPDATING II: CIVIC ACTIVITIES


In the last posting, this blog started a more current review of the literature concerning issues associated with social capital and civic humanism.  The first of these qualities – social capital – is promoting a societal bias, which is characterized by having an active, public-spirited citizenry, egalitarian political relations, and a social environment of trust and cooperation.[1] As for civic humanism, Isaac Kramnick describes it as follows:
[C]ivic humanism conceives of man as a political being whose realization of self occurs only through participation in public life, through active citizenship in a republic.  The virtuous man is concerned primarily with the public good, res publica, or commonweal, not with private or selfish ends.[2]  
          Scott Keeter, Cliff Zukin, Molly Andolina, and Krista Jenkins offer a set of behaviors that captures the interests associated with social capital and civic humanism.  They are civic, political voice, and electoral activities.[3]  These writers report research that looks at such factors from political attentiveness to political volunteerism and how they characterized vis-à-vis these behaviors.  Here, below, are some of their summary findings.
          To remind the reader, the last posting advertised this posting would address civic literacy.  The approach this posting uses for this purpose is to first look at what would motivate one to attain civic literacy.  One motivation is to improve, through exercising civic activities, the wellbeing of a citizen’s local community and advancing a citizen’s self-interest.  What this writer is becoming aware of is that that literature is more extensive than first thought.  Consequently, the predicted development stated in the last posting will not be met; it will need more space.  But this development continues by addressing these three types of activities.
Civic activities include belonging to civically oriented organizations such as fraternal and religious organizations, volunteer efforts, fundraising efforts for charitable organizations, and other community problem-solving groups.  Of course, civic literacy is further enhanced if the citizen in question participates in those groups’ activities.
As for political voice and electoral activities, the first include those actions citizens can take to politically push a policy position – signing petitions, communicating with government officials, writing letters to editors and other media outlets, boycotting, etc. – and the latter includes voting and other election related behaviors.  The general thrust is to advance those qualities that one can link with social capital by harboring those normative beliefs associated with civic humanism through actualizing these three activity types. 
The question here is:  what does recent research indicate how Americans are performing in relation to these behaviors?  To provide some context, Mary E. Hylton makes a connection in her report.  That is, that a citizenry that engages in these types of activities add to their communities’ resources and can be associated with economic resilience.[4] 
This was demonstrated in those years following the onset of the financial crisis of 2008.  Communities that had among their citizenry higher levels of civic engagement were able to recover more readily.  While this is a correlational finding, one cannot help but think that either directly or indirectly there is a mutual reinforcing dynamic between civic engagement and economic health. 
Further strengthening this connection, one can detect this relationship holding at the individual level.  Jonathan Greenblatt reports in a White House paper:  “Volunteering also helps people develop skills and confidence.  A recent report by the National Conference on Citizenship found the ‘participation in civil society (such as volunteerism) can develop habits that make individuals enjoyable and strengthen the networks that help them find jobs.’”[5]
In a study, Malte Klar and Tim Kasser found that political activism is positively associated with measures of good feelings (hedonic), a sense of being happy, healthy, and prosperous (eudaimonic), and social well-being.[6]  And college students, according to an Association of American Colleges and Universities publication, who are civically engaged register greater levels of satisfaction with their educational experience, enjoy higher grade point averages, and more apt to gain their degrees than those who are not so engaged.[7]
With those positive effects – ones that should function as motivators – this posting will cease.  The next posting will report on civic literacy.  Still to be addressed, further in the future, is current research done over social empathy.



[1] A la, Robert Putnam.  See Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2000.

[2] Isaac Kramnick, “John Locke and Liberal Constitutionalism I,” in Major Problems in American Constitutional History, Volume I:  The Colonial Era Through Reconstruction, ed. Kermit L. Hall (Lexington, MA:  D. C. Heath and Company, 1992), 97-114, 98.

[3] Scott Keeter, Cliff Zukin, Molly Jenkins, and Krista Jenkins, “The Civic and Political Health of the Nation: A Generational Portrait,” Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), accessed on May 10, 2018, https://www.unc.edu/courses/2009ss1/poli/472/001/472%20Summer%2009%20course%20CD/Summer%202009%20Readings/Week%205/Civic_Political_Health%5B1%5D.pdf .

[4] Mary E. Hylton, “The Role of Civic Literacy and Social Empathy on Rates of Civic Engagement among University Students,” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 2018, vol. 22, 1, 87-106.

[5] Jonathan Greenblatt, “The Benefit of Civic Engagement for Tomorrow’s Leaders,”  White House (of Barack Obama), April 17, 2012, accessed May 10, 2018, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2012/04/17/benefits-civic-engagement-tomorrows-leaders .

[6] See Malte Klar and Tim Kasser, “Some Benefits of Being an Activist:  Measuring Activism and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being,” (abstract), accessed May 10, 2018, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00724.x .

[7] The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement, “A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future” (Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2012), accessed May 7, 2018, http://www.aacu.org/civiclearning/crucible .

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

UPDATING I


Past postings of this blog present the concern of how effective civic education is in promoting student engagement in the governance and politics of their local communities.  Some writers who address this concern use the term civic engagement to designate this concern.  There are various operational definitions of civic engagement; one of them is offered by Thomas Ehrlich:  “[T]o make a difference in the civic life of our communities. … It means promoting the quality of life in a community through both political and non-political processes.”[1]
          The earlier message of this blog is that schooling in America has been deficient in promoting civic engagement.  What has more recent research indicated in this area of concern?  This posting looks at that research.[2]  To summarize that research, current evidence does not paint a more promising picture assuming one sees civic engagement in a positive light.
          Thom File reports in 2013 that fewer Americans take the time to vote.[3]  To many, voting is seen as the bottom line level of participation or engagement.  Yet, in the last national election, the 2016 presidential election, 58.6% of eligible voters voted.  In the last mid-term election, 2014, 36.4% turned out.  How about other forms of involvement?
          Peter Levine and Eric Liu observe that Americans don’t belong to local, community organizations as much or go to community meetings as often as in the past.[4]  This finding echoes what Robert Putnam indicates in his 2000 classic work, Bowling Alone.[5]  Adding to this picture, a national task force found that Americans are also less apt to contact public officials and that young adults (18 to 29 year-olds) have engaged to lesser levels in civic affairs – like voting and other civic oriented activities – when measured over the last four decades.[6]  File further reports on less voting.[7]
          The task force also found that general understanding of governance has declined along with overall all civic literacy.  Civic literacy, as a concept, relates to what this blog has referred to as political knowledge and political skills.  According to a site, Urban Agenda, civic literacy means:  … the knowledge of how to actively participate and initiate change in your community and the greater society. It is the foundation by which a democratic society functions … a means to create avenues for peaceful change.”[8]  If one states it that way, it sounds important – and it is.
          So much so, research has been done on how much civic literacy there is among Americans.  This blog will report on that research in its next posting.  Knowledge and skills are two important aspects of citizenship, but before they become utilized, one needs to be motivated to use them.  In an upcoming posting, this account will look at a motivator, social empathy. 
Yes, acquiring and using political knowledge and skills can be motivated by other concerns, some might be very self-centered.  But in terms of civic literacy, one needs to first care about the societal conditions around him or her.  This blog has used the term civic humanism to designate such a motivated concern.  The next posting will continue this review and look closer at civic literacy and then beyond, a look at social empathy will follow.


[1] Thomas Ehrlich, Civic Responsibility and Higher Education (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2000), vi.

[2] Most of the sources cited in this posting are previously identified by Mary E. Hylton.  See Mary E. Hylton, “The Role of Civic Literacy and Social Empathy on Rates of Civic Engagement among University Students,” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 2018, vol. 22, 1, 87-106.

[3] Thom File, Young-Adult Voting: An Analysis of Presidential Elections, 1964–2012 (Current Population Survey Reports, P20-572) (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013).

[4] Peter Levine and Eric Liu,  “America’s Civic Renewal Movement: A View from Organizational Leaders (Medford, MA:  Tufts Report, Tufts University, 2015).

[5] Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2000).

[6] The National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement, “A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future” (Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2012), accessed May 7, 2018, http:// www.aacu.org/civiclearning/crucible .

[7] Thom File, Young-Adult Voting: An Analysis of Presidential Elections, 1964–2012.

[8] Urban Agenda, accessed May 7, 2018, http://www.urbanagenda.wayne.edu/whatiscl.htm .