A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, June 13, 2014

DISAPPOINTING

You might be against trading five members of the Taliban for a captured American soldier. You might be against treating that captured American soldier as a hero because he might have deserted his post. But if you believe in the basic tenets of American justice, you can't be against making every effort to bring him back home. You can't, even if you choose to believe he is a traitor, when the young man has not been tried or even been given the opportunity to defend himself, or even if you don't like the president who arranged for his exchange. That line of thinking just doesn't add up to being true to how Americans are supposed to deal with people who are accused of anything. It also doesn't add up to how we treat our soldiers, especially those who become prisoners of our enemies. And you don't criticize his father for growing a beard or learning a language. You also don't condemn the soldier's hometown for planning a celebration over his release. This whole business of personal attacks, prevalent in the far right press, reeks of being despicable.

For those of you who follow this blog, you know that I don't rant about the issues of the day. My intent here is to describe and explain a perspective of governance and politics of which you might not be aware. My other purpose is to address some issues involved with schooling, especially those that pertain to civics education. I hope some of the postings I issue in this space would be useful to teachers who might use them to introduce or initiate discussions over pending concerns facing the nation. But this latest round of demagoguery is just too much. While I have no problem with people questioning the President's action with the exchange – I happen to believe he did the right thing – the whole suggestion that this young man should have been left behind is not worthy of even being considered. That young man is part of us; he is our federated partner. We cannot purposely abandon him and still say we believe in our constitution. If it turns out that he needs to be accused of a crime, then that is what will be done – I trust our military officials to do what is legally proper to do. But all of that comes in due time and soon enough. As long as Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl was a captive of the enemy, it was not the time.

No comments:

Post a Comment