A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

GENERAL COUNTER MEASURES AMONG RELATED GROUPS


[Note:  This posting is a continuation of a report on the development of a civics unit of study.  This unit is directing students to formulate informed positions on the opioid epidemic.  It is being developed in real time.  Writer wants to express gratitude to Wikipedia for identifying the bulk of the research this blog has used in the development of this unit.[1]]
Among those who provide counter measures to the various aspects of the opioid crisis, there are medical professionals and others.  This posting focuses on the others from national figures to those from the media.  Here are the related factoids:
·        The CDC, in 2016, issued a guideline publication, “Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.”  Included in this document is the recommendation that opioid use be restricted to those cases where the anticipated benefits for pain treatment are judged to be of greater weight than the inherent risks.  It further calls for medical personnel to prescribe the lowest effective dosage and avoid prescribing, at the same time, other opioids and/or benzodiazepine when possible.[2]  In addition, the CDC was heavily lobbied while the government agency was producing this guideline.[3]
·        Such experts, such as epidemiologist Silvia Martin, have begun issuing warnings especially where there has been a general social acceptance of opioid use.  What Martin calls for is that parents and youth be better informed about the negative risks opioids present.  In addition, she advises that better training for medical professionals be provided.[4]
·        While the media covering this epidemic tend to portray it as a criminal problem, many see it as a medical problem.[5]
·        In a Washington Post story, the newspaper used the services of the fired DEA regulator, Joseph Rannazzisi, to report on the politics associated with the highly advancing number of deaths in 2016 due to opioids.  Apparently, the former regulator lost in his efforts to rein in the interests of pharmaceutical companies in providing opioids.[6]
·        Irrespective of heavier coverage of white victims in the media, consumption of opioids among Hispanics, blacks, and Native Americans have been comparable to whites.  In terms of deaths, each of these groups have experienced a 200 to 300% increase between 2010 and 2014.  The lack of recorded numbers among Asians prevents one from making a similar observation.
The accompanying insights are:
·        A lead researcher at the University of Florida, Chris Delcher, claims that following the “crackdowns” over the prescription of addictive drugs, the cost of such drugs decreased, and their availability rose, resulting in increased numbers of deaths due to fentanyl, heroin, and morphine.[7]
·        One aspect of how the nation has met the opioid epidemic has been the way the media portrays its victims.  In general, white victims, more usually living in rural areas, are given more space, longer contextual information (background stories), and reviews of the lost opportunities addiction has represented.  Media coverage of urban blacks victimized by the drug problem seem to emphasize heroin use, reinforcing stereotypes of that group.[8]
·        Of late, utilizing keywords has opened opportunities by researchers and law enforcement agents of gaining information from social media, such as tweets, on the acquisition and use of opioids.  Governing this type of investigation is the enacted legislation, the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act.[9]
Next posting will focus more attention to the medical reactions this nation has undertaken to meet the challenges of this epidemic.



[1] The writer also wants to state that where possible, he has checked the sources and has at times added to the listed research.

[2] Deborah Dowell, Tamara M. Haegerich, and Roger Chou, “CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain – United States, 2016,” JAMA Network, April 19, 2016, accessed August 20, 2018, https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2503508 .  Google defines benzodiazepine as follows:  any of a class of heterocyclic organic compounds used as tranquilizers, such as Librium and Valium (see:  https://www.google.com/search?q=meaning+the+word+benzodiazepine&oq=meaning+the+word+benzodiazepine&aqs=chrome..69i57.11724j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 ).

[3] Matthew Perrone, “Painkiller Politics:  Efforts to Curb Prescribing under Fire,” The Washington Times, December 18, 2015, accessed August 20, 2018, https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/18/effort-to-curb-painkiller-prescribing-faces-stiff-/ AND Azeen Ghorayshi, “Missouri Is the Only State in the US Where Doctors Have No Idea What Prescriptions People Are Getting,” BuzzFeed News, March 7, 2017, accessed August 20, 2018, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/azeenghorayshi/missouri-americas-drugstore .  These two articles hint, from different political perspectives, at the politics involved with attempts at addressing the opioid crisis.

[4] Silvia S. Martins and Lilian A. Ghandour, “Nonmedical Use of Prescription Drugs in Adolescents and Young Adults:  Not Just a Western Phenomenon,” World Psychiatry, originally published February 2017 (online publication January 26, 2017), accessed August 20, 2018, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5269500/ .

[5] Emma E. McGinty, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks, Julia Baller, Jeff Niederdeppe, Sarah Gollust, Colleen L. Barry, “Criminal Activity or Treatable Health Condition?  News Media Framing of Opioid Analesic Abuse in the United States, 1998-2012,” Psychiatric Services, December 1, 2015, accessed August 20, 2018, https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.201500065 .

[6] Scott Higham and Lenny Bernstein, “Who Is Joe Rannazzisi:  The DEA Man Who Fought the Drug Companies and Lost, The Washington Post, October 15, 2017, accessed August 20, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/who-is-joe-rannazzisi-the-dea-man-who-fought-the-drug-companies-and-lost/2017/10/15/c3ac4b0e-b02e-11e7-be94-fabb0f1e9ffb_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.bc6e81705555 .

[7] Doug Bennett, “Report:  Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Not Shown to Affect Drug Overdoses,” Santa Rosa's Press Gazette, May 22, 2018, August 20, 2018, http://www.srpressgazette.com/news/20180522/report-prescription-drug-monitoring-programs-not-shown-to-affect-drug-overdoses .  Apparently, the crackdowns have not affected the supply of opioids.

[8] Julie Netherland and Helen B. Hansen, “The War on Drugs That Wasn’t:  Wasted Whiteness, ‘Dirty Doctors,’ and Race in Media Coverage of Prescription Opioid Misuse,” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, December 2016, vol. 40, no. 4, 664-686, abstract accessed August 20, 2018, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11013-016-9496-5 .

[9] Janel Firestein, “Using AI in Wholesale Distribution to Mitigate Opioid Abuse,” Clarkston Consulting, February 21, 2018, accessed August 20, 2018, https://clarkstonconsulting.com/insights/ai-wholesale-distribution-opioids/ .

No comments:

Post a Comment