A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Tuesday, November 6, 2018

RACE AS A FACTOR IN SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT


In the last posting, this blog made the case:  parental income affects – at least as correlational studies show – how well their children will do economically as adults years later.  Rich parents tend to have children that will be rich; mid-range income parents will see their children follow suit; and the same can be said for low income parents and their children.  So, one can conclude, class is a factor in determining success.
          How about race?  Does race have an effect, and if so, how much?  Before attempting to answer this question, one should consider:  why ask?  One asks because if race does affect success rates and one supports the federalist value, regulated equality, then that affect should be subject to some regulation.  But this question of race and its effect is not so easy to answer.
          Muddling the effort is how the economy – and the nation’s history – has posed so many obstacles to various minorities.  Of course, that disadvantage has been pre-eminent among African-Americans.  Their history in this nation has been a long string of horrendous mistreatment with slavery, Jim Crow policies, institutional discrimination, deprivation of decent schooling and lack of life-fulfilling employment opportunities. 
And to support such treatment, among the white majority there has been the common belief that blacks are inferior, especially in terms of intelligence.  Given that backdrop, how does one, who believes in federalist values, think or act on the findings of Abigail and Stephen Thernstrom?[1]  They demonstrate the challenge that exists in figuring out what is affecting student success when race is a factor.
First, it is no surprise, given the above outlined history of injustice, that African-Americans, as a demographic group, do not do well when it comes to schooling, key to success.  Of course, there are exceptions of note, but compared to other demographic groups, e.g., whites, Hispanics, Asians, etc., African-Americans rank low.  But, then again, they rank low in income and wealth.  Does that mean the income/wealth factor cause blacks to rank so low in education?  That is, is it race or income that is affecting school performance?
What happens when black kids are compared with white kids, for example, when income is controlled?  That is, how do higher income black kids compare to higher income white kids?  By higher income, of course the reference is to their parents’ incomes.  And how about mid-range income kids and lower income kids from the two demographic groups?
In terms of higher income kids, here is a summary statement by the Thernstroms:
The majority of African-American students are stuck in inferior big-city schools.  But [collected] data … suggest a more sobering conclusion.  Increased movement of black families into suburban communities [where higher income families live] – as desirable as that is – will not solve the problem of black academic underperformance.  It’s not that black kids in suburbia don’t do better than their urban peers [of lower income parents].  They do.  But suburban whites also outperform urban whites, and the gap – the difference in scores between the two racial groups – remains almost unchanged.[2]
In general, among income brackets, the gains whites make as they go up in those brackets, blacks only experience thirty-three percent of those gains.  Or as those writers state it:
The data available to us were not in a form to permit an analysis that would reveal exactly how great the overlap is [among socioeconomic variables[3]], but a number of sophisticated studies of the black-white achievement gap have found that controlling for all the standard measures of socioeconomic status [like residential location] together cuts the black-white gap by only about one-third.[4]
This then is a riddle.  Why don’t African-Americans students experience, as compared to white students, the same upshot in school performance when income and residency has experienced an “upgrade” from lower income levels and inner-city living conditions?  This posting leaves the reader with this question; next posting will further report on the Thernstroms’ findings.

[1] Abigail Thernstrom and Stephen Thernstrom, No Excuses:  Closing the Racial Gap in Learning (New York, NY:  Simon & Schuster, 2003).

[2] Ibid., 128.  These determinations are based on National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) testing scores and that deserves further comment, perhaps in another posting.

[3] Variables include parental education attainment, urban-suburban-rural residencies, religious affiliation, age, and the like.

[4] Abigail Thernstrom and Stephen Thernstrom, No Excuses:  Closing the Racial Gap in Learning, 129.

No comments:

Post a Comment