A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

UPDATING CIVIC LITERACY


This posting and ones to follow are a restatement of what has been addressed previously in this blog.  Some of the sentences to come have been provided before but the concern is that other information has been discovered and an update seems appropriate.  The blog has not changed the overall message, civics education is seriously deficient, but some of the evidence needs updating.
          As with what has been reported before, this writer uses the same questions.  He asks:  to what level of knowledge do Americans – beginning with secondary students – command in terms of their government and politics?  How and to what degree do they engage in politics, demonstrate political skills, civility, and law-abiding behavior?  These questions are treated in a meaningful but summary way. This account will begin with the first question, regarding political knowledge or how the relevant literature today identify this knowledge, civic literacy. 
Civic Literacy
          Those who are concerned with the quality of civics education have an advantage.  Most academic fields, when the same evaluative questions are asked, must rely on mostly testing results.  While testing can also shed information about civics, those parties need only look around and judge the quality of citizenship he/she sees among fellow citizens.  So, this account will cite testing results, but also observations by various scholars who study this aspect of human behavior.
          One can cite an array of studies, for example, concerning political knowledge[1] – and the other above listed concerns – but, with a limited number, this account will report what the state of the citizenry is.  It is not so good.  More recent research extends what previous research has discovered but is a bit more nuanced.  Below is a sampling of this more recent research.
Mary Hylton defines this term, civic literacy, as follows:  “a basic understanding of the structure and functioning of government as well as the political process through which decisions are shaped.” [2]  She also includes how people know and understand the underlying values reflected in the US Constitution, including liberty, freedom, and justice.[3] 
The Pew Research Center has reported recent survey information on the state of knowledge and the information reflects how the 2018 midterm elections seem to have affected civic literacy.[4]  The electorate seemed to be informed about relevant current political issues – e.g., the role the Electoral College plays in determining who becomes president – but demonstrated significantly less knowledge over currently unfocused facts concerning the structure of government.
Here is a sampling of what they report:
The public does less well on other questions about the structure of American government.  Overall, 56% know that the number of terms a president can serve is determined by the 22nd Amendment; 54% can correctly identify the vice president as the person who casts the tie-breaking vote in deadlocked Senate.
          Fewer than half (41%) are aware that 60 votes are needed to end a filibuster in the U. S. Senate, the lowest level of public knowledge on any of the seven questions included in the survey.
Republicans and Democrats perform about equally well on the civic and political knowledge questions included in the survey.  For example, nearly identical shares of Republicans and Republican leaners (87%) and Democrats and Democratic leaners (86%) know that the First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech.  There [are] no significant divides between Republicans and Democrats on most questions and 4 percentage points is the most that separates the two groups on any single item (80% of Republicans can correctly identify the Electoral College, compared with 76% of Democrats).[5]

Perhaps these numbers reflect the virulence that certain political questions seem to have in current popular consciousness.  The election of Trump to the presidency, one could argue, has upped public concerns – as illustrated by the vast demonstrations the nation has witnessed since the 2016 election. 
A look at the recent past might provide a better view of political knowledge although one can detect by this 2018 Pew report that whatever knowledge is shared by the American public seems to be targeted on what seems most relevant to the Trump era politics and not an overall knowledge of the American government.
Reportage, as recently as 2016, this writer believes portrays a more accurate view of American civic literacy.  That is, the level of civic literacy is so low that it had been widely reported in the press.  For example, a Boston Globe article cites an Annenberg Public Policy Center study which reports:
·        only 36% of American adults could name the three branches of the central government;
·        almost 75% didn’t know it takes two-thirds in each house of Congress to override a presidential veto;
·        only 38% could correctly identify which political party controls either house of Congress; and
·        25% believe that Congress can override a 5-4 Supreme Court decision.[6] 
These are considered reflecting basic governmental information; the type news reports assume readers or listeners know.
What of young Americans; does the next upcoming generation give one hope for a better-informed electorate?  The results of a 2010 exam, given by the National Center for Educational Statistics group, report only 24% of high school seniors scoring at a proficient or advanced level (64% scored at or above basic level).[7]  This finding, with a bit of improvement, was mostly mirrored in the testing of college students.[8]  The ISI study summary states:
Unfortunately, the results of ISI's past civic literacy research does not inspire confidence that our institutions of higher learning are living up to their educative and civic responsibilities, responsibilities that almost all American colleges recognize as critical to their overall public missions.[9]
One issue often not included in reporting these deficiencies is the fact the currently the study of civics itself has been jettisoned from the nation’s curriculum.  At this time, American schools have dropped or otherwise not included civics in their offerings.  American history is still generally offered, but civics as a separate course is offered only in one of three schools nationally.[10]
Civic literacy, as a concept, relates to what the questions above refer to as political knowledge and political skills.  According to a site, Urban Agenda, civic literacy means:  … the knowledge of how to actively participate and initiate change in your community and the greater society. It is the foundation by which a democratic society functions … a means to create avenues for peaceful change.”[11]  If one states it that way, it sounds important – and it is.
          Knowledge and skills are two important aspects of citizenship, but before they become utilized, one needs to be motivated to use them.  One such motivator is social empathy – more closely looked at in a future posting.  Yes, acquiring and using political knowledge and skills can be motivated by other concerns, some might be very self-centered.  But in terms of improving civic literacy, one needs to first care about the societal conditions around him or her.


[1] “Executive Summary of the Results of the Latest Administration of Assessment Test on Civic Knowledge.” National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 2006, http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/itmrls AND  James G. Gimpel, J. Celeste Lay, and Jason E. Schuknecht, Cultivating Democracy: Civic Environments and Political Socialization in America (Washington, DC:  Brookings Institution Press, 2003) AND “Report on Survey Conducted by NASS on Americans’ Knowledge of Political System,” National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS), 1999, http://www.nass.org/  (since originally accessed, the report has been taken down) AND “Executive Summary of the Results of the Latest Administration of Assessment Test on Civic Knowledge,” NAEP AND Andrea Neal, “Disengaged:  We Have Failed at Civic Education,”  Indianapolis Star, November 2, 2017, accessed November 6, 2017, https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/2017/11/02/andrea-neal-weve-failed-civic-education/826756001/ AND Pew Research, “How Increasing Ideological Uniformity and Partisan Antipathy Affect Politics, Compromise and Everyday Life,” Center Political Polarization in the American Public, June 12, 2014, accessed on February 21, 2017,  http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/.
[2] Mary E. Hylton, “Civic Engagement and Civic Literacy among Social Work Students: Where Do We Stand?,” Journal of Policy Practice, vol. 14, 3-4, 2015, 292-307, (doi:10.1080/15588742.2015.1004396), 296.
[3] Mary E. Hylton, “Civic engagement and civic literacy among social work students: Where do we stand?”
[4] “Political Engagement, Knowledge and the Midterms,” Pew Research Center, April 26, 2018, accessed April 8, 2019, https://www.people-press.org/2018/04/26/10-political-engagement-knowledge-and-the-midterms/ .
[5] Ibid.
[6] “Americans’ Knowledge of the Branches of Government Is Declining,” Annenberg Public Policy Center, September 13, 2016, accessed May 14, 2018, https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/americans-knowledge-of-the-branches-of-government-is-declining/ .
[7] National Center for Education Statistics, The Nation’s Report Card:  Civics 2010 (Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2011), (NCES 2011-466), accessed May 14, 2018, http://nces. ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2010/2011466.pdf .
[8] Association of American Colleges and Universities, A Crucible Moment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future (2012), accessed May 14, 2018, https://www.aacu.org/crucible AND Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Enlightened Citizenship: How Civic Knowledge Trumps a College Degree in Promoting Active Civic Engagement, 2011, accessed May 15, 2018, https://www.americancivicliteracy.org/2011/summary_summary.html [a summary account], AND Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, “Americans Know Surprisingly Little about Their Government, Survey Finds,” 2014, accessed May 15, 2018, https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/americans-know-surprisingly-little-about-their-government-survey-finds/.
[9] Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Enlightened Citizenship: How Civic Knowledge Trumps a College Degree in Promoting Active Civic Engagement, November 1, 2011, accessed April 9, 2019, https://www.heartland.org/publications-resources/publications/enlightened-citizenship-how-civic-knowledge-trumps-a-college-degree-in-promoting-active-civic-engagement .
[10] Campbell Streator and Maria Yuan, “Young Americans Are Politically Engaged.  They Need to Be Civically Educated.”  Real Clear Policy, February 27, 2019, accessed April 8, 2019, https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2019/02/27/young_americans_are_politically_engaged_they_need_to_be_civically_educated_111079.html .
[11] Urban Agenda, accessed May 7, 2018, http://www.urbanagenda.wayne.edu/whatiscl.htm .

No comments:

Post a Comment