A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Friday, May 31, 2019

MOSTLY DREARY


Jonah Goldberg provides a way to see societal morality that might sound foreign to some readers.  Here is his take:
What societies decide is right or wrong becomes what is right and wrong for most of the people who live in them.  But I think the lessons of history show that societies can choose poorly – and that this can be proved empirically through facts and reason.  Some cultures are better than others, not because of some gauzy metaphysical claim, but because they allow more people to live happy, prosperous, meaningful lives without harming other people in the processes.  Because this is true, it is incumbent upon all of us to fight for a better society, to defend the hard-learned lessons of human history, and to be grateful for what we have accomplished.[1]
This conservative author goes on to point out that what one would consider a normal life – approaching the material well-being one can find in advanced nations like the US – is a relatively modern development.  At best, according to Goldberg, one can only go back just over three hundred years before any humans began to appreciably improve their state of being.
          Civics educators don’t need to agree with Goldberg, but they are immeasurably helped by becoming knowledgeable of what Goldberg is getting at.  He proposes an argument that, if at all reasonable, should affect how a civics teacher sees his/her subject matter.  This blog wants to review his argument for this purpose – to encourage that sort of reflection on the part of those teachers.
          Goldberg first couches his view against the total history[2] of human existence.  One would think that such a context would take hundreds and hundreds of pages, but it does not.  Why?  Because most of that history – he claims homo sapiens have a history of over 250,000 years – can be viewed as a recurring story.  That is, humans have met with brutish conditions on an ongoing basis for just about all of that time.  “Semi-hairless, upright, nomadic apes foraging and fighting for food.  No change …”[3] over this extended period.  In other words, human existence – its natural state – was a Hobbesian one.
          And what is that?  He describes it as grinding poverty, horrific violence, and, for the individual, a short life.  The estimate is that average life span in pre civilized times was 35 years and that that brevity lasted way beyond the dawn of civilization.[4]  And he points out that such “advancements” such as agriculture did not improve things.  It, agriculture for example, limited diet choices and it introduced strenuous work regimens.  Yet today, things are different.  People live longer and work less strenuously to acquire significantly more enriching things, at least among people who luckily live in those advanced nations.  What happened?
          According to Goldberg, a “Miracle” happened.  The next posting will explain.


[1] Jonah Goldberg, Suicide of the West:  How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy (New York, NY:  Crown Forum, 2018), 5 (Kindle edition).

[2] The term history here is not limited to written history, but the whole past of human existence on the planet.

[3] Ibid., 6 (Kindle edition).

[4] “Medicine and Health,” Stratford Hall, n.d., accessed May 30, 2019, http://www.stratfordhall.org/educational-resources/teacher-resources/medicine-health/ .  Estimates vary, but one needs to remember the prevalence of disease.

No comments:

Post a Comment