A Crucial Element of Democracy

This is a blog by Robert Gutierrez ...
While often taken for granted, civics education plays a crucial role in a democracy like ours. This Blog is dedicated to enticing its readers into taking an active role in the formulation of the civics curriculum found in their local schools. In order to do this, the Blog is offering a newer way to look at civics education, a newer construct - liberated federalism or federation theory. Daniel Elazar defines federalism as "the mode of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system by distributing power among general and constituent governments in a manner designed to protect the existence and authority of both." It depends on its citizens acting in certain ways which Elazar calls federalism's processes. Federation theory, as applied to civics curriculum, has a set of aims. They are:
*Teach a view of government as a supra federated institution of society in which collective interests of the commonwealth are protected and advanced.
*Teach the philosophical basis of government's role as guardian of the grand partnership of citizens at both levels of individuals and associations of political and social intercourse.
*Convey the need of government to engender levels of support promoting a general sense of obligation and duty toward agreed upon goals and processes aimed at advancing the common betterment.
*Establish and justify a political morality which includes a process to assess whether that morality meets the needs of changing times while holding true to federalist values.
*Emphasize the integrity of the individual both in terms of liberty and equity in which each citizen is a member of a compacted arrangement and whose role is legally, politically, and socially congruent with the spirit of the Bill of Rights.
*Find a balance between a respect for national expertise and an encouragement of local, unsophisticated participation in policy decision-making and implementation.
Your input, as to the content of this Blog, is encouraged through this Blog directly or the Blog's email address: gravitascivics@gmail.com .
NOTE: This blog has led to the publication of a book. The title of that book is TOWARD A FEDERATED NATION: IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL CIVICS STANDARDS and it is available through Amazon in both ebook and paperback versions.

Tuesday, April 30, 2019

UPDATING CIVILITY, PART III


[Note:  This posting, the previous several postings, and at least the one to follow are a restatement of what has been addressed previously in this blog.  Some of the sentences to come have been provided before but the concern is that other information has been discovered and an update seems appropriate.  The blog has not changed the overall message – that civics education is seriously deficient – but some of the evidence supporting that message needs updating.]
Civility among the nation’s political class, according to what most Americans see currently, is in short supply.  The last posting provided evidence of that in the form of a poll taken by the Georgetown Institute for Politics and Public Service.  That posting ended with informing the reader this posting will use the concept social capital to provide more of a qualitative sense of what the nation is experiencing not only in politics, but across all sorts of social interactions.
The social scientist, Robert D. Putnam, for example, using that concept, paints a disheartening picture.  He defines social capital as a societal quality characterized by having an active, public-spirited citizenry, egalitarian political relations, and a social environment of trust and cooperation – qualities that might seem utopian given the current state of affairs. 
In determining whether a given society has high or low levels of social capital, a social scientist can measure an array of social indicators.  They can also provide social narratives that illustrate what is happening today.  Putnam looked at a wide variety of studies of Americans in general, and youth in particular, and came to disturbing conclusions.  He found, relative to American historical standards, there is less concern for communal involvement and higher levels of uncivil and criminal behavior.
Here is a stated description that reflects Putnam’s findings.  In a 2002 study, Public Agenda reported:
Most Americans surveyed in a study released today say rudeness is on the rise in our society and 41 percent admit they too are sometimes a part of the problem. Unhappiness with reckless drivers, cell phone abuse, poor customer service, swearing and litter came from big cities and small towns … nearly half the people surveyed (46 percent) say bad service drove them out of a store in the past year...
Among the report's key findings were that:
79 percent of Americans say lack of respect and courtesy should be regarded as a serious national problem; only 19 percent say it should not be viewed as serious given other issues facing society; 73 percent believe Americans did treat one another with greater respect in the past; just 21 percent attributed those feelings to a false nostalgia for a past that never existed; 62 percent say that witnessing rude and disrespectful behavior bothers them a lot and 52 percent said the residue from such episodes lingers with them for some time afterwards; [s]ix in 10 believe the problem is getting worse, and; 41 percent confess to having acted rude or disrespectful themselves.[1]
This study shows Putnam is not alone, other sources, both professional social scientists, as the above study indicates, and popular media reports, echo his message. 
Similar reports date back to the 1990s[2] but those years, even 2002, have been a long time ago.  Are things better today?  The global public relation firm, Weber Shandwick, in partnership with KRC Research, conducts an annual survey over American views on civility.  These studies began in 2010 and year after year the studies taps into a consistent opinion among Americans, the nation has a civility problem. 
A recent report of the 2018 version of this yearly effort states, “In this year’s installment, we find Americans continuing to report a severe civility deficit in our nation, with a vast majority – 93% – identifying a civility problem in society, and most classifying it as major problem (69%).”[3]
Some years ago, comedians Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert staged a rally in Washington D. C. whose main message was a call to restore civility to our national political discourse.  The rally, described by the New York Times as “the enormous crowd, which stretched from the Capitol almost to the Washington Monument”[4] and was covered live on C-Span. 
In short, the rally hit a responsive chord.  It reflected the general recognition that life in America, when it comes to getting along with others, is becoming more challenging.  This account on social incivility ends with a contemporary statistic:  56% of all fatal accidents have at least one of the involved drivers exhibiting aggressive driving – better known as road rage.[5]
          But why, one can ask, are things so uncivil?  The next posting will venture into the often-cited main causes for this social instability.  Underlying the rudeness, short-temperedness, and belligerence are economic realities but the trend toward this concerning condition has grown not only during times of economic challenge but during economic abundance as well. 
The use of social capital shifts the emphasis a bit; a shift that adds nuance to a crude economic characterization.  For one thing, this blog has also argued that the economic factors have settled into a receptive cultural foundation with the nation’s adoption of the natural rights perspective as its dominant view of government and politics. 
As the evidence above indicates, incivility predates the most recent economic downturn; the downturn just heightened what was already in the works.  Some of these other factors have already been mentioned, but the next posting will review them in terms of how they affect the levels of social capital in the nation.



[1] This research conducted for The Pew Charitable Trusts, a non-profit organization. This survey study interviewed 2,013 adults randomly selected.

[2] A review of this literature includes the following: Concerned Educators Allied for a Safe Environment (CEASE). The Effect of Violence on Children’s Lives (Information Sheet # 10). New York: Teacher College Press, 2000; Gest, T. and Pope, V. (1996, March 25). Crime time bomb. U. S. News and World Report. pp. 28-36; Ellis, B. E. (1996, June/July). Why kids are ruining America. George. pp. 96-98 & 128; Newsweek. “The Rap on Rap.” (October 9) (2000): 58-65.  Starting in the 1990s, there was a sense that social behavior was becoming too uncivil.  This sense was reflected in the writings of social commentators across the political spectrum (from Hillary Clinton on the left, to Michael Novak on the right).  Citizens in general seemed concerned over the low levels of civility being manifested in contemporary American life.  See Don E. Eberly, “Introduction: The Quest for a Civil Society,” in Building a Community of Citizens: Civil Society in the 21st Century, ed. Don E. Eberly (Lanham, MD:  University Press of America, Inc., 1994), xvii-xlviii.

[3] Weber Shandwick, “Civility in America 2018:  Civility at Work and in Our Public Squares,” Powell Tate/KRC Research, n. d., accessed April 28, 2019, https://www.webershandwick.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Civility-in-America-VII-FINAL.pdf.

[4] Sabrina Tavernise and Brian Stelter, “At Rally, Thousands – Billions? - Responded,” New York Times, October 30, 2010, accessed April 27, 2019, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/us/politics/31rally.html?_r=1&hp.

[5]Road Rage,” NBC News:  NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, July 14, 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment